Another Quad type network is the last thing Asia needs

Indonesian Foreign Ministers Retno Marsudi (right) and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (left) hold a joint press conference after their meeting at the Foreign Ministry’s office in Jakarta, Indonesia, December 14 2021. / Getty

Indonesian Foreign Ministers Retno Marsudi (right) and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (left) hold a joint press conference after their meeting at the Foreign Ministry’s office in Jakarta, Indonesia, December 14 2021. / Getty

Editor’s Note: Andrew Korybko is an American political analyst based in Moscow. The article reflects the views of the author and not necessarily those of the CGTN.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken hinted on December 16 that America may try to build another Quad-type network in Asia. Speaking in Indonesia, the senior US diplomat said, “We will deepen our alliances with Australia, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Philippines and Thailand. We will foster greater cooperation among these allies and seek ways to link our allies with our partners – as we have done with the Quad. “

Its implicit aim would be to complicate China’s relations with the region, as evidenced by also saying that “there are so many concerns from North East Asia to South East Asia, from Mekong in the Pacific Islands, on Beijing’s aggressive actions. “

Observers should note that Blinken made no reference to South Asia or the US’s Indian Quad partner, which could be due to his dissatisfaction with that country’s latest strategic partnership agreement with Russia, following President Putin’s visit last week.

New Delhi’s commitment to the military component of the Quad became increasingly questionable after the massive 99-paragraph Russian-Indian Joint Statement comprehensively covered their security cooperation until 2030.

This came shortly after the successful virtual meeting of Russia-India-China (RIC) foreign ministers last month. Given the United States’ zero-sum perspective on international relations, therefore, it is expected to be looking to recalibrate the Quad to focus more on conventional alliances.

Nevertheless, it is also worth mentioning that all the countries concerned are part of last year’s Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) which was agreed in November 2020, which is the largest trading bloc in the world. In addition, last month’s China-ASEAN comprehensive strategic partnership also reaffirmed Beijing’s close relations with each member of this Southeast Asian bloc. Blinken’s new Quad-type plot is therefore an attempt to divide and rule the wider region.

The secretary of state’s hostile claims against China on which he hopes to build his country’s new Quad-type structure have no basis. He said that “we are determined to guarantee freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, where Beijing’s actions threaten the movement of trade worth $ 3 trillion every year.” This is not true since it is the dangerous naval provocations of the United States that it wrongly describes as so-called “freedom of navigation operations” (FONOP) that pose the greatest threat to trade.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (2nd right) meets with Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi (non-swimming pool) at the Indonesian Foreign Ministry’s office in Jakarta, Indonesia, December 14, 2021. / Getty

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken (2nd right) meets with Indonesian Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi (non-swimming pool) at the Indonesian Foreign Ministry’s office in Jakarta, Indonesia, December 14, 2021. / Getty

He is also partly wrong in stating that “This is not a contest between a region centered on the United States and a region centered on China.” The “contest” (to use its terminology) does indeed involve a US-centric region, but it is inaccurate to describe its alternative as “China-centric”. There is nothing “China-centric” about the legitimate UN-enshrined “rules-based order”, another phrase the United States so fond of using, but it has. recently perverted to describe their dangerous unilateralism across the world.

In fact, China strictly abides by the UN rules-based order, so much so that the United States realized that it would gradually lose its hegemony over time, unless it unilaterally changed the rules. so-called “rules of the game”.

This explains why he launched the ‘Pivot to Asia’ in 2011, after which he began to stir up trouble in the South China Sea around 2014 before former US President Donald Trump waged his trade wars and technological unprovoked against China that his successor has sued. .

This month’s falsely described “Democracy Summit” was intended to artificially create ideological fault lines in what the United States sees as its “new cold war” with the Chinese “competitor,” on the basis subjective American criteria of what constitutes a “democracy”. This norm itself is paradoxically undemocratic since it contradicts the resolution 62/7 of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the diversity of democratic models in the world.

This international legal document declares that “although democracies share common characteristics, there is no single model of democracy and democracy does not belong to any country or region, and reaffirms[s] in addition, the need for respect due to sovereignty, the right to self-determination and territorial integrity. ideological basis.

What Asia needs right now is closer coordination among its many countries, not exacerbated divisions between them by interested third parties on the other side of the world like the United States.

The new Quad-type network that Blinken alluded to during his speech in Indonesia is counterproductive, dangerous and doomed to failure. The countries he proposed (included in this structure) should realize that they are set to become America’s pawns, hence the need to reject their plans.

(If you would like to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at [email protected])

Source link

About Thomas Brown

Check Also

Despite clear division on big issues, Congress broadly agrees on China

Despite strong divisions on most major issues, Democrats and Republicans in Congress agree on at …